Connect with us

Clint Eastwood


On September 17, 2021, the film “Cry Macho” was released in theaters. As reported by Parade, the Clint Eastwood-directed film stars Eastwood himself as the main character who has to come to terms with aging out of a masculine persona he no longer embodies. In a way, the film is Eastwood’s reckoning with his macho man past, being the lead star of many hypermasculine-driven spaghetti westerns like “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” and “A Fistful of Dollars,” and in a more contemporary vein, his “Dirty Harry” Callahan character (via IMDb).
At an advanced age, the actor may have regrets and introspection, as many people are wont to do. However, this reckoning seems a bit contradictory, given that the man himself has been less than faithful in his relationships with women in his past. As Ireland’s Independent says, Eastwood seems to have had as many affairs as his body could handle. How can reckoning follow a life of betrayal and adultery?

Eastwood grew up in the Great Depression era and also served in the Korean War. Britannica says he took up acting soon after his army discharge and got early work with small parts in movies like “Revenge of the Creature,” “Tarantula,” and the like until his contract ended. Like many actors, Eastwood had a somewhat slow start breaking into the industry, but eventually found his first big role in “Rawhide,” a western TV series that ran from 1959 to 1965. It was during this time that Eastwood’s hard man persona that he would eventually come to fully embody began to materialize. Making the leap from American TV to spaghetti westerns directed by Sergio Leone catapulted him to stardom.
He became one of the most successful actors of his time, mostly in films involving more action than dialog. Eastwood didn’t rest on his acting laurels, however; he also took up directing. Per IMDb, he’d direct notable movies such as “Cry Macho,” “American Sniper,” “Million Dollar Baby,” and more. He earned best director and best picture Oscars for “Unforgiven” in 1993 and “Million Dollar Baby” in 2005.
CLINT EASTWOOD HAD A SECRET LOVE CHILDNew Africa/ShutterstockTo say that Eastwood lived a fairly complicated life is an understatement. Despite being married, the actor got around a lot in his time, sleeping with many women. As Daily Mail reported in 2018, Eastwood kept a few secrets, like him fathering a secret love child by the name of Laurie Murray. It all started before Eastwood and Maggie Johnson got married in 1953. Eastwood had fallen in love with Murray’s mother at the time, and the two developed a very serious relationship. Eastwood was engaged at the time to Maggie Johnson but did not tell her about this affair. Murray’s birth mother put her up for adoption.
According to Newsner, neither Murray nor Eastwood reportedly knew their connection until years later, when Murray sought to discover who her biological father was. She and an investigator eventually found paperwork that had Eastwood’s name on it, cementing the relationship.
CLINT EASTWOOD FREQUENTLY SLEPT WITH FELLOW ACTRESSESBOKEH STOCK/ShutterstockJust how far did Eastwood take his philandering? As the Independent says, Karen Sharpe, an actress from the TV series “Rawhide,” which starred Eastwood, said that there was a woman on set almost every day who was there to sleep with him. “There was a girlfriend with a job that ensured she’d be there every day. She didn’t seem to have any work in particular, other than being with Clint at lunch,” Sharpe said.
Sondra Locke was an actress who starred in a few Eastwood movies such as “Sudden Impact” and “The Outlaw Josey Wales” (via IMDb). She also had a notable live-in relationship with Eastwood, which fell apart and culminated in a court battle between the two. As reported by Vanity Fair, Locke got into a lawsuit with Eastwood back in 1989 for palimony. The lawsuit eventually ended in a $1.5 million settlement.
Michael Ochs Archives/Getty ImagesEastwood and Locke had a relatively long relationship, until that all fell apart, followed by the lawsuit. It seems that the relationship not only soured, but actually became quite toxic. As The Guardian says, Locke was a fairly accomplished and charismatic actor of her own, who had performed in numerous movies, frequently with Eastwood. She and Eastwood had met when Locke was already in a platonic marriage with Gordon Leigh Anderson, her childhood friend, sculptor who was also gay.
Reportedly, Eastwood had manipulated her, as he promised her a project-development deal, which ended up being fraud. This was what the second lawsuit was about, as she alleged that Eastwood had only set that deal up to get the palimony suit thrown under the rug. As the Los Angeles Times reports, Eastwood’s wife at the time, Maggie Johnson, had finally decided to get a divorce with the actor in 1977, during which Eastwood and Locke had been working together. And though not known with absolute certainty, the relationship with Locke might have been the proverbial last straw in that marriage (per Wide Open Country). In her palimony suit (per the Los Angeles Times), Locke alleged that Eastwood had “a terrible temper … and he has frequently been abusive to me.”

In general, when people hear the word duel, they tend to think of either the wild west or Victorian gentlemen with top hats and pistols. Perhaps even Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. As Britannica explains, a duel is essentially an old-timey way of settling disputes outside of the court system. It involves two or more people armed with weapons, whether it be guns or swords or something else, and a fight, sometimes resulting in the death of one or both parties. Nor was dueling the exclusive right of men.
Turns out that modern duels might still happen. Eastwood actually almost got involved in a duel, believe it or not, over an affair with a woman. As East Bay Times reports, Eastwood and actress Jean Seberg had gotten romantically involved in the 1960s, being co-stars in the musical “Paint Your Wagon.” Despite the fact that both were married to other people, they continued on with the affair. Seberg eventually cut it off with her husband Romain Gary, a French novelist and diplomat, who took great offense and challenged Eastwood to a duel. The duel itself never actually happened, however, and Gary basically moved on with his life.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Clint Eastwood

‘Gran Torino’: Clint Eastwood Co-Star Bee Vang Blames the Film for ‘Mainstreaming Anti-Asian Racism’

Clint Eastwood‘s Gran Torino earned praise from critics and audiences. Many criticized the Awards for not nominating the film at the ceremony. However, some folks came forward to condemn Eastwood’s film regarding its use of racial slurs. Gran Torino star Bee Vang came forward to criticize the film for “mainstreaming anti-Asian” racism.

Bee Vang starred in Clint Eastwood’s ‘Gran Torino’ as Thao Vang Lor

'Gran Torino' Bee Vang, Clint Eastwood, Ahney Her smiling with Eastwood's arms around Vang and Her

L-R: Bee Vang, Clint Eastwood, Ahney Her | Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images

Gran Torino follows Walt Kowalski (Eastwood), who is a widow and Korean War veteran. His family alienates him and he’s angry at the world. Walt’s young neighbor, Thao Vang Lor (Vang), tries to steal Walt’s 1972 Ford Torino to impress a local gang, but Walt ultimately develops a close relationship with Thao and his family.

Vang earned a role in Eastwood’s Gran Torino. However, he wanted to elevate the movie and breathe authenticity into it. “During the shooting of the film, I tried to stay true to the script,” Vang wrote in the St. Paul Pioneer Press. “But as a Hmong person, I also tried to do justice to my own life and to that of others like me.”

Bee Vang blames Clint Eastwood’s ‘Gran Torino’ for ‘mainstreaming anti-Asian racism’

Vang wrote a piece on NBC News that outlines anti-Asian racism in the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic era. He reflected back on starring in Eastwood’s Gran Torino and how it connects with the modern social and political climate.

“At the time, there was a lot of discussion about whether the movie’s slurs were insensitive and gratuitous or simply ‘harmless jokes,’” Vang wrote. “I found it unnerving, the laughter that the slurs elicited in theaters with predominantly white audiences. And it was always white people who would say, ‘Can’t you take a joke?’”

However, Vang looks back at Gran Torino with a different perspective, especially regarding the anti-Asian racism spreading around the world during the coronavirus pandemic.

“Gran Torino may have elided the crisis in Asia that birthed our diaspora and many others across the Pacific,” Vang wrote. “But more concerning was the way the film mainstreamed anti-Asian racism, even as it increased Asian American representation. The laughter weaponized against us has beaten us into silent submission.”

Vang continued: “To this day, I am still haunted by the mirth of white audiences, the uproarious laughter when Eastwood’s curmudgeonly racist character, Walt Kowalski, growled a slur … It’s a ‘harmless joke,’ right? Until it’s not just a joke, but rather one more excuse for ignoring white supremacy and racism.”

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic overtly perpetuates anti-Asian racism

Vang uses Eastwood’s Gran Torino as an example of how anti-Asian racism becomes integrated into mainstream culture. It’s not simply a joke to Vang when it has real-world ramifications. The 2008 film is not harmless content for Vang and many folks who spoke against the movie’s use of anti-Asian racism.

“In times of crisis, solidarity requires a collective commitment to justice,” Vang wrote in NBC News. “We cannot lose sight of this, or it will become impossible to imagine a new and better world. And I no longer wonder what people mean when they ask me why I can’t take a joke. Covid-19 has removed all doubt.”

Continue Reading

Clint Eastwood

Clint Eastwood Once Said We’re in a ‘P**** Generation’: ‘Everybody’s Walking on Eggshells’

Clint Eastwood is a legendary name in Hollywood. He remains one of the biggest western movie stars of all time. However, the world also knows him for his particularly conservative values and beliefs. Some audiences applaud him for his social and political stance, while others criticize him for it. Eastwood once explained what the “p**** generation” is and how it impacts him.

Clint Eastwood is an actor and director

Clint Eastwood in article about new generation smiling in front of AFI Fest step and repeat

Clint Eastwood | Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic

Eastwood’s first acting role was an uncredited part in 1955’s Revenge of the Creature. However, he truly hit the big time by playing the Man with No Name in Sergio Leone’s Dollars Trilogy. The franchise consists of 1964’s A Fistful of Dollars, 1965’s For a Few Dollars More, and 1966’s The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. His legacy continues to live on through its impact on modern cinema.

Eastwood stepped behind the camera for the first time with 1971’s Play Misty for Me. He didn’t stop acting, but his passion certainly pushed him to continue making movies. At the time of writing, Eastwood earned four Academy Awards for films including Unforgiven and Million Dollar Baby.

Clint Eastwood said that we’re in a ‘p**** generation’

Esquire interviewed Eastwood and his son, Scott to discuss their experiences in Hollywood and their personal beliefs and ideals. The social and political climate entered the conversation, resulting in his discussion of Donald Trump and people’s level of sensitivity to specific topics.

“But he’s [Trump] onto something, because secretly everybody’s getting tired of political correctness, kissing up,” Eastwood said. “That’s the kiss-ass generation we’re in right now. We’re really in a p**** generation. Everybody’s walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people of being racist and all kinds of stuff.”

Eastwood continued: “When I grew up, those things weren’t called racist. And then when I did Gran Torino, even my associate said, ‘This is a really good script, but it’s politically incorrect.’ And I said, ‘Good. Let me read it tonight.’ The next morning, I came in and I threw it on his desk and I said, ‘We’re starting this immediately.’”

He described the “p**** generation” by saying, “All these people that say, ‘Oh, you can’t do that, and you can’t do this, and you can’t say that.’ I guess it’s just the times.”

Eastwood further described the generation as one where, “Nobody wants to work.”

‘Gran Torino’ continues to divide audiences

Eastwood’s conversation comments previously offended some audiences. However, his films also speak for themselves. Gran Torino star Bee Vang spoke out about the film, accusing it of “mainstreaming anti-Asian racism.” The film includes slurs against Asian people and turns them into a joke for mainstream audiences to laugh at. Vang and other critics raise the problems that arise with such casual racism.

Eastwood most recently made Cry Macho. He also starred in the lead role. He currently doesn’t have any films set for the new year, although he doesn’t show any sign of slowing down and retiring. Stay tuned for more information on Eastwood’s next project.

Continue Reading

Clint Eastwood

How The Good, The Bad & The Ugly 2 Would’ve Brought Back Clint Eastwood

The unmade The Good, The Bad And The Ugly 2 would have brought back Clint Eastwood in a surprising way. Clint Eastwood had spent years on a classic western series Rawhide before landing what would turn out to be a star-making role in 1964’s A Fistful Of Dollars. This low-budget Italian western was a remake of Akira Kurosawa’s Yojimbo and saw Eastwood’s Man with no Name playing two gangs against each other. The movie’s style and Eastwood’s iconic turn saw the movie become a surprise success and it helped establish the spaghetti western subgenre.

The popularity of westerns began to wane during the ’60s and ’70s, and later outings usually took a darker, more cynical view of the west. Clint Eastwood’s westerns tended to be more violent, and the lines between heroes and villains were very blurred. Eastwood directed some of his most famous outings in the genre himself, including High Plains Drifter – which has a supernatural angle – Pale Rider and 1992’s acclaimed Unforgiven.

The Man with no Name is still Clint Eastwood’s most famous western antihero, and following A Fistful Of Dollars, he reprised the character twice, for 1965’s For A Few Dollars More and The Good, The Bad And The Ugly. This latter entry is actually a prequel to the events of the previous films and followed three characters hunting for buried gold against the backdrop of the American Civil War. The Good, The Bad And The Ugly is the most acclaimed of director Sergio Leone’s Dollars trilogy and has been hailed as a masterpiece. The movie ends with Eastwood’s “Blondie” riding off with half of the gold, and co-writer Luciano Vincenzoni later revealed he had plans to make The Good, The Bad And The Ugly 2, with Clint Eastwood returning as narrator.

For context, The Good, The Bad And The Ugly ends with Eastwood’s Man with No Name having killed Lee Van Cleef’s Angel Eyes and seeming to leave Eli Wallach’s Tuco to hang. In the final moments, he shoots Tuco’s noose to free him, with Tuco cursing out Eastwood’s character as he rides away. Vincenzoni’s The Good, The Bad And The Ugly 2 was to take place 20 years later, with Tuco tracking down the grandson of Blondie for the gold. Reportedly, Clint Eastwood – who has directed many movies – was interested in serving as narrator for a potential The Good, The Bad And The Ugly 2, though it’s unknown if the Man with No Man would have actually appeared in the story.

Sadly, there’s little solid information available on The Good, The Bad And The Ugly 2, including when it was being developed, though the late ’80s seems likely. Vincenzoni confirmed Lee Van Cleef and Eli Wallach were interested in returning too, and it appears Joe Dante was being courted as director. It was Leone who killed The Good, The Bad And The Ugly 2, as he didn’t want any more sequels to happen or his name linked to it. Vincenzoni put this down to a rift between the two men, but without Leone’s consent, The Good, The Bad And The Ugly 2 quickly died. It’s hard to know if the sequel could have worked without Clint Eastwood (who turned down Superman 1978) as the main character, though it certainly would have been intriguing to see what happened next.

Continue Reading