Connect with us

Best Of

Fans Are Stunned: Goldie Hawn Looks Completely Different! Check Her Out Now!

Recently, captivating images of the beloved actress Goldie Hawn, who is now 77 years old, emerged, taking many by surprise. These candid snapshots, captured by keen-eyed photographers, showcase her current appearance during a film project. Interestingly, the history between Goldie and Kurt Russell dates back to 1966 when their paths first crossed on a film set. However, what truly altered the course of their relationship was an unexpected encounter after Goldie had spent two decades married to another man. Now, after four decades of being together, their bond remains as vibrant as ever.

This iconic pair continues to capture the public’s attention, not only for their impressive careers but also for their enduring love story. Recently, they were spotted strolling hand in hand, radiating warmth and affection. Their intimate moment didn’t go unnoticed, with fans expressing their admiration and joy over their relationship. Comments poured in, highlighting their connection, with many declaring, “What a beautifully harmonious couple! They are so cool!” Others chimed in with sentiments like, “This is what genuine love looks like! I can’t take my eyes off them!”

As the couple enjoys their golden years, there’s also a recognition that time brings change. Some observers noted the signs of aging on Goldie, with remarks such as, “I barely recognized my favorite actress!” and “It’s clear that age has taken its toll.” Despite these comments, the underlying message remains that the love shared between Goldie and Kurt is as strong as ever. Their relationship continues to inspire many, showcasing that genuine love can withstand the test of time.

Goldie Hawn’s journey in the entertainment industry is as remarkable as her personal life. Born in 1945, she has enjoyed a stellar career in film and television, starting as a dancer before making her way into acting. She gained fame in the 1960s and 1970s, starring in iconic films like Goldie and the Bear and The First Wives Club. Her vibrant personality and infectious laugh made her a household name.

n the midst of her rising stardom, Goldie faced her own challenges, especially in her romantic life. Her marriage to musician Gus Trikonis in the late 1960s was short-lived, and she later tied the knot with actor Bill Hudson. Their relationship produced two children, Oliver and Kate Hudson, who have both followed in their mother’s footsteps and established successful careers in Hollywood.
Despite the ups and downs of her early relationships, Goldie’s fate took a turn when she met Kurt Russell. Their first encounter on the set of The One and Only, Genuine, Original Family Band marked the beginning of a significant chapter in both of their lives. However, it wasn’t until the mid-1980s, after Goldie’s divorce from Hudson, that the two reconnected. This reunion would eventually blossom into a deep and meaningful relationship, but it wasn’t without its hurdles.
Goldie and Kurt’s decision to remain unmarried throughout their long relationship has sparked conversations and debates over the years. Many admire their commitment to each other, which proves that love doesn’t always have to conform to traditional expectations. The couple has often expressed that their bond is solidified by mutual respect, admiration, and a deep understanding of each other’s individualities.
Their family dynamics also illustrate the essence of their partnership. Goldie’s children have embraced Kurt as a stepfather figure, further solidifying their unique family unit. The couple often shares glimpses of their life together through social media, showcasing their adventures, vacations, and celebrations with family. Their playful banter and affectionate interactions resonate with fans, revealing a genuine friendship at the core of their romance.
In the realm of Hollywood, where relationships can often be fleeting, Goldie and Kurt stand out as a testament to lasting love. They have navigated the complexities of life in the public eye while maintaining a sense of normalcy in their personal lives. Their ability to grow together, face challenges, and celebrate joys has inspired many to believe in the possibility of enduring love.
As they continue to age gracefully together, Goldie and Kurt have become symbols of what it means to embrace life’s journey hand in hand. Their recent outing, marked by moments of laughter and shared glances, serves as a reminder that love can indeed flourish, regardless of the passing years. Fans who witnessed the couple’s recent public display of affection couldn’t help but reflect on their own relationships, drawing inspiration from Goldie and Kurt’s unwavering commitment.
While some fans express nostalgia for the youthful appearances of their favorite celebrities, many others choose to focus on the essence of their character and the stories behind their journey. For Goldie Hawn, her legacy is not only defined by her successful career in film but also by the love and warmth she shares with those around her, particularly with Kurt. Their story embodies the idea that true beauty transcends physical appearances, resting instead in the bonds we create with others.
In a world that often prioritizes youth and superficial qualities, Goldie and Kurt represent a refreshing perspective. They remind us that love is not only about the initial spark but also about nurturing a deep connection over time. Their journey is a beautiful reminder that, while age may bring changes to our appearances, the love shared with those closest to us can remain timeless and ever-evolving.
As they continue to navigate this stage of their lives, Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell serve as a beacon of hope and inspiration for couples everywhere. Their relationship stands as proof that love, commitment, and genuine connection can withstand the tests of time, making them not just a celebrated couple in Hollywood but also an enduring example for generations to come. Fans will continue to cherish the moments they capture, celebrating the remarkable story of love that Goldie and Kurt have created together, one cherished memory at a time.
PROC. BY MOVES

Best Of

Clint Eastwood: They both have an adventure, It’s a new adventure

admin

Actor Clint Eastwood has worked with a variety of filmmakers during his years in the film industry. In his experience, there was one filmmaking habit he could barely tolerate from other directors.

It might have also showed Eastwood what not to do when he indulged in a career behind the camera.

Clint Eastwood once called out directors who did too many takes

Eastwood became interested in directing fairly early in his acting career. After getting his big break in the classic Western series Rawhide, he asked to direct a couple of episodes.

“Then, the production company reneged on their promise that I could do it,” Eastwood once told DGA.“They said that CBS didn’t want actors who were in the shows to be directing the shows. So I kind of dropped the idea for a while and then, after I’d been working with Sergio Leone on A Fistful of Dollars, observing the crews in Europe and getting a broader look at filmmaking around the world, I got interested again.”
Opportunity presented itself when Eastwood eventually directed his first feature Play Misty for Me.
“It was a great experience, and I had the bug after that,” Eastwood said.
It was perhaps because of his own time as a filmmaker that Eastwood understood the process behind other directors. At one point, Eastwood became very critical of directors who did multiple takes. So much so that he called into question their qualifications and expertise as filmmakers.
“Some of these new directors will shoot 30 takes of a scene just because they don’t know what they want. They wind up with thousands of feet [of film], then they cry for some some editor to come in and save their butts. If you can’t see It yourself, you shouldn’t be a director,” Eastwood once told The New York Times.
Clint Eastwood has been known for only doing a couple of takes
Eastwood seems to have maintained his philosophy for limited takes in his more mature years. Actors like Matt Damon have been pleasantly surprised by the veteran star’s efficiency as a filmmaker. The Bourne Identity star had even gotten chewed out by Eastwood for wanting to do more than one take in Invictus.
“We did the first take, it went pretty well, but Clint says, ‘Cut. Print. Check the gate.’ Which means we’re gonna move on,” Damon recalled on Hot Ones. “And I said, ‘Hey, boss, maybe you think we can get one more?’ And he just turned and he goes, ‘Why? You wanna waste everybody’s time?’ I was like, ‘Ok, we’re done. Alright good, let’s move on.’”
But Eastwood believed his own habit for working quickly in films came down to his work on the small screen.
“I came up through television, and in television you had to move fast. The important thing, of course, is what comes out on the screen. I like to move fast only because I think it works well for the actors and the crew to feel like we’re progressing forward,” he said.
However, Eastwood cautioned that his reputation as a quick director could easily backfire.
“You don’t want to do Plan 9 from Outer Space, where the gravestones fall over and you say, ‘I can’t do another take. We’re too busy. Move on.’ You’re still making a film that you want to be right. But I find, as an actor, that I worked better when the directors were working fast,” he said.
Clint Eastwood once preferred directing over acting
Although he’s experienced massive success doing both, Eastwood asserted that there were certain benefits being a filmmaker had over being an actor.
“To doing both jobs, I’ve done it so many times that I never put the difference in. Directing a film is the same… it’s a little more leisurely that way. You don’t have to suit up. People aren’t coming in and combing your hair or whatever. It’s a little more leisurely, but different. But they both have an adventure. It’s a new adventure,” he said.
PROC.BY MOVIES

Continue Reading

Best Of

John Wayne Turned Down Oscar-Winning Lead Role Because It’s ‘the Most Un-American Thing I’ve Ever Seen in My Whole Life,’

Oscar-winning actor John Wayne is one of Hollywood’s biggest icons. The world knows him for his war and western movies that audiences of all ages could enjoy. However, he also turned down a fair amount of roles over the course of his career. Wayne rejected the lead role in High Noon and called it “the most un-American thing I’ve ever seen in my whole life.”

Wayne didn’t serve in the military, which would later become one of his biggest regrets. Nevertheless, he was still a major patriot. Wayne was vocal when it came to speaking his mind about his conservative Republican values. He frequently spoke his mind about his perspective and how they related to the social and political climate in interviews. Wayne turned down some roles in movies such as Steven Spielberg’s 1941 as a result of his patriotism.

However, Wayne’s views were also at odds with many of his colleagues. His 1971 Playboy interview remains in many minds. Wayne openly said a slur against the LGBTQ community and made racially problematic statements. He’s a Hollywood icon who was never afraid to speak his mind, regardless of who or what it was about.

Ronald L. Davis’ Duke: The Life and Image of John Wayne explores the Oscar-winner’s past and his interactions with various Hollywood productions. He was offered the role of Marshal Will Kane in Fred Zinnemann’s High Noon. He turned the role down, which then went to actor Gary Cooper instead.

The story follows Will as he’s getting ready to leave the small town of Hadleyville, New Mexico, with his new wife, Amy (Grace Kelly). He discovers a criminal who was set free and is set on seeking revenge on the marshal who originally turned him in. The townsfolk cower in fear of his return, so Will has to face him alone.
“The most un-American thing I’ve ever seen in my whole life,” Wayne said. “I’ll never regret having helped run Carl Foreman [High Noon’s screenwriter] out of the country.” Foreman was a member of the Communist Party for a time, which Wayne called out.
Davis noted that “Duke incorrectly remembered the Western’s final scene as one in which the United States marshal played by Gary Cooper throws his badge to the ground and steps on it.” However, Cooper’s character never steps on the badge. Rather, he tosses it to the ground before retreating to the desert.
Gary Cooper won an Oscar for ‘High Noon’
Wayne would finally win an Oscar with his third nomination for Best Actor in a Leading Role for 1969’s True Grit. However, he was earlier nominated for Best Actor in a Leading Role for Sands of Iwo Jima and Best Picture for The Alamo.

Continue Reading

Best Of

John Wayne famously stormed up to Douglas after a screening to rage: “Christ, Kirk, how can you play a part like that

admin

I’m Spartacus!” – “I’m Spartacus!” – “I’M SPARTACUS!” Every film buff knows that moment, every panel-show comedian riffs on it. A mob of defeated slave rebels in the pre-Christian Roman empire is told their wretched lives will be spared, but only if their ringleader, Spartacus (Kirk Douglas), comes out and gives himself up to be executed. Just as he is about to sacrifice himself, one slave, Antoninus (Tony Curtis) jumps up and claims to be Spartacus, then another, and another, then all of them, a magnificent display of solidarity, while the man himself allows a tear to fall in closeup.

This variant on the Christian myth – in the face of crucifixion, Spartacus’s disciples do not deny him – is a pointed political fiction. In real life, Spartacus was killed on the battlefield. The screenplay was written by Dalton Trumbo, the blacklisted author who had to work under aliases and found no solidarity in Hollywood. Yet Douglas himself, as the film’s producer, stood up for Trumbo. He put Trumbo’s real name in the credits, and ended the McCarthy-ite hysteria.

Kirk Douglas in SpartacusHe’s Spartacus: Douglas in his most famous role.The main reason the scene is so potent is its extraordinary irony. Who on earth could claim to be Spartacus when Spartacus looked like that? Douglas is a one-man Hollywood Rushmore, almost hyperreal in his masculinity. He is the movie-world’s Colossus of Rhodes, a figure of pure-granite maleness yet with something feline, and a sinuous, gravelly voice. Douglas is a heart-on-sleeve actor, mercurial and excitable; he has played tough guys and vulnerable guys, heroes and villains. And, as a pioneering producer, he brought two Stanley Kubrick films to the screen: Spartacus (he hired Kubrick to replace Anthony Mann) and his first world war classic Paths of Glory in which he was superb, playing a principled French army officer.

One hundred years ago today, Douglas was born Issur Danielovitch, the son of a Moscow-born Russian Jewish ragman, in upstate New York. An uncle had been killed in the pogroms at home. In his 1988 memoir, The Ragman’s Son, Douglas describes the casual antisemitism he faced almost throughout his career. Rebranding yourself with a Waspy stage-name was what actors – and immigrants in general – had to do in America to survive and thrive.

After a start on the Broadway stage, he made his screen reputation playing the driven fighter Midge Kelly in the exhilarating boxing movie Champion (1949), which earned him the first of his three Oscar nominations. Champion has stunning images and a notable slo-mo scene: it is much admired by Martin Scorsese and transparently an influence on Raging Bull. In Detective Story (1951), directed by William Wyler, Douglas gives a grandstanding star turn in a melodrama set in a police station, playing the vindictive, violent McLeod, an officer with an awful secret. It was a movie that laid down the template for all cop TV shows, including The Streets of San Francisco, which was to star Douglas’s son Michael.
But it was in Ace in the Hole (1951), directed by Billy Wilder, that Douglas gives his first classic performance: the sinister newspaper reporter Chuck Tatum, who prolongs the ordeal of a man trapped in a cave to create a better story. He is an electrifying villain in that film, a Phineas T Barnum of media untruth. At one stage he slaps the wife of the trapped man (whom he is also seducing) because she wasn’t sufficiently demure and sad-looking for his purposes, like an imperious film director looking for a better performance. He is also brilliant in Vincente Minnelli’s The Bad and the Beautiful (1952) as Jonathan Shields, the diabolically persuasive movie producer who betrays everyone.
Arguably, it is in Paths of Glory (1958) that Douglas finds his finest hour as the tough, principled Colonel Dax, who stands up to the callous and incompetent senior officers of the high command. Douglas’s handsome, unsmiling face is set like a bayonet of contempt.
Douglas himself prizes his sensitive and Oscar-nominated performance as Vincent van Gogh in another Vincente Minnelli film, Lust for Life, from 1956. Some may smile a little at this earnest and high-minded movie now, but it is very watchable, with a heartfelt belief that Van Gogh’s art can be understood by everyone. There is a bold, passionate performance from Douglas, who simply blazes with agony. Not everyone liked it. John Wayne famously stormed up to Douglas after a screening to rage: “Christ, Kirk, how can you play a part like that? There’s so goddamn few of us left. We got to play tough, strong characters. Not those weak queers!”
Douglas has endured a scene of almost Freudian trauma in his career. Having bought the rights to Ken Kesey’s novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest in the 1960s, he himself played the lead for its Broadway adaptation: McMurphy, the subversive wild-man imprisoned in a psychiatric hospital.
PROC. BY MOVIES

Continue Reading

Trending