Entertainment

John Wayne’s Casting Made Funding Stagecoach A Struggle For John Ford – My Blog

John Ford was considered one of the top directors in Hollywood when he decided to make an elevated Western in 1939’s “Stagecoach.” The notion struck many in the industry as odd. Westerns were generally considered programmers, and, thus, beneath the talents of a man who’d won the 1935 Best Picture Oscar for “The Informer.” But Ford was enamored of Ernest Haycox short story “The Stage to Lordsburg,” and believed the public was ready for a fresh take on the genre. He also thought the ensemble film’s lead, John Wayne, was at long last ready to become a star.The rest of Hollywood was not so certain. If Ford was serious about taking on this so-called “classic Western,” why was he hellbent on casting Wayne, an actor of seemingly limited range scrapping it out in B movies?Few in the industry understood what Ford was attempting. In fact, one of his most vital associates, David O. Selznick, wanted absolutely no part of “Stagecoach.”Never doubt John Ford when he’s taking on a WesternUnited ArtistsAccording to David Welky and Randy Roberts’ “John Wayne: Treasures,” the brash Selznick loathed just about every aspect of “Stagecoach.” He didn’t want to make an ensemble Western with anyone, much less a downmarket star like Wayne. This project was not worthy of Ford, and nothing in which Selznick wanted to invest. Undaunted, Ford modified his pitch to appeal to the finicky producer. Per Welky and Roberts:“Ford and his partner at Pioneer Pictures, Merian Cooper, explained the importance and potential of ‘Stagecoach’ as a new breed, a ‘classic Western.’ Slowly, Selznick began to come around. Perhaps with a few big name stars – maybe Gary Cooper and Marlen Dietrich – the script’s love interest could be built up enough to give the film box-office punch, he thought.”Alas, Wayne and Claire Trevor were already cast. Realizing they were going to get nowhere with Selznick, Ford and Cooper took the film to United Artists’ Walter Wanger, a more mild-mannered producer who, if nothing else, wouldn’t enforce his personality on the project. This proved a pretty good fit, though Wanger, like everyone else in Hollywood, did not understand Ford’s allegiance to Wayne. Nevertheless, he was eager to hook up with a filmmaker of Ford’s stature, so he accepted the casting and the rest is history.Amusingly, Selznick eventually overcame his allergy to “classic Westerns,” and attempted to make the apotheosis of the form with 1946’s gloriously overheated “Duel in the Sun.” Though the film has since been embraced by modern critics and championed by Martin Scorsese, it received mixed reviews at the time and fell far short of commercial expectations (Selznick believed he had the “Gone with the Wind” of Westerns). It was the last Western Selznick would ever make.

Entertainment

NCIS star Pauley Perrette now unrecognisable after quitting acting

For 15 seasons, Pauley Perrette was synonymous with her character Abby Sciuto, a forensic specialist on NCIS.

But in 2017, she shocked fans by announcing she wouldn’t be returning to the popular crime show. At the time of the announcement, Perrette said it was a decision made a year earlier.

Since then, she has only appeared in the now defunct sitcom Broke, going from a fixture on television to rarely seen. Perrette now says she’ll “never again” return to acting.

“I’m not ungrateful for the benefits that it gave to me,” she said in an interview with HELLO! “But I’m a different person now and I want to be here for it – the good and the bad and the painful.”

“I want to be me all the time,” she continued. “And it takes a good amount of courage for me to say that to myself, but it’s authentically how I feel.”

“At this point in my life I have this deep need to find authenticity in everything, and being an actor, especially at certain points in my life, was a great escape; it’s like a drug because I didn’t have to be me, I could be somebody else. My character didn’t have all of the problems that I was having.”

But Perrette hasn’t completely turned her back on the entertainment industry. She’s now producing films, specifically documentaries; her most recent project being Studio One Forever in 2023.

“It’s why I only watch documentaries, I want the truth. For me, going back to being an actor would be taking away from this life of true authenticity that I’m living 100 per cent of the time.”

Days after Perrette’s final NCIS episode aired in May 2017, she wrote on social media that she’d endured “multiple physical assaults,” implying that was the real reason she had exited the program.

Fans remained devastated, hoping she’d return, but the actress insisted she wouldn’t. In June 2019, Perrette implored the public to stop asking if she’d ever reprise her role, claiming she was “terrified” of former co-star Mark Harmon, “and him attacking me.”

There were reports that the two clashed on set because of a dog bite, but that has never been confirmed.

CBS later announced that Perrette had shared workspace concerns before exiting the show and that the network had investigated. Perrette expressed her appreciation for both the studio and the network.

NCIS is still on the air – its 22nd season premieres on screens this month.

Entertainment

Can you solve this puzzle?

### Puzzle Details:
1. **Frank says:** “I didn’t do it.”
2. **John says:** “Frank is lying.”
3. **Peter says:** “Frank is telling the truth.”

### Analyzing the Statements:
Let’s analyze the implications of their statements:

– If **Frank** is telling the truth (he didn’t do it):
– Then **John** is lying (since he claims Frank is lying).
– If John is lying, that means **Frank** is indeed innocent.
– **Peter** is telling the truth by claiming Frank is honest.

Thus, if Frank is telling the truth:
– Frank = Innocent
– John = Guilty (because he lied)
– Peter = Innocent

– If **Frank** is lying (he did it):
– Then **John** is telling the truth (as he says Frank is lying).
– If John is telling the truth, then Frank is indeed guilty.
– **Peter** is lying (as he claims Frank is telling the truth).

Thus, if Frank is lying:
– Frank = Guilty
– John = Innocent
– Peter = Guilty (because he lied)

### Summary of Scenarios:
1. **Frank is Innocent:** (Frank: Truth, John: Lie, Peter: Truth)
2. **Frank is Guilty:** (Frank: Lie, John: Truth, Peter: Lie)

### Conclusion:
– If Frank is innocent, John’s statement indicates he is guilty, which means Peter must be innocent.
– If Frank is guilty, then John is innocent but Peter must now be guilty.

**In both scenarios, we can determine that John cannot be guilty at the same time as Frank.**

Thus, the only consistent solution appears to be:
– **Frank is guilty.**
– **John is innocent.**
– **Peter is lying.**

Therefore, only one man is guilty, which is **Frank.**

Entertainment

Look closer, the photographer was not expecting this photo

For most couples, their wedding day is the happiest day of their lives.

A wedding is a celebration of love between two people who choose to spend their lives together. It marks the start of a new journey filled with shared experiences, personal growth, and mutual support.

A wedding is a happy time for the whole family to come together. From saying vows to sharing the first dance, weddings are full of special moments that create lasting memories. These memories are cherished by the couple and their loved ones for years.

When planning their wedding, couples carefully consider every detail to make sure it’s perfect. From choosing the venue to picking the décor and theme, weddings show the couple’s unique love story.

However, in trying to give their guests a unique experience, some couples do strange things. Whether they regret it when they look back at their wedding photos years later, we don’t know. But we do know that some weddings are so awkward they make us question the bride and groom’s sanity, while others are so fun they make us smile.

Check out the video below to see some of the most interesting weddings you’ve ever seen.