Connect with us

Entertainment

One Of Unforgiven’s Most Memorable Scenes Was Inspired By John Wayne In The Shootist – Old western – My Blog

Clint Eastwood and John Wayne may be Western icons but they didn’t exactly see eye-to-eye on the genre that made them both superstars. Back in the early ’70s, B-movie maestro Larry Cohen (“Q: The Winged Serpent,” “The Stuff”) wrote a screenplay called “The Hostiles,” intended as a vehicle for both Wayne and Eastwood to co-star. It was an appropriate title; Wayne didn’t want to be in a movie with the younger actor, writing a poison pen letter to Eastwood citing his hatred of “High Plains Drifter” as one of the reasons.Cohen never fulfilled his dream of a film starring Wayne and Eastwood, and it is perhaps little surprise that the two legends didn’t hit it off. They represented very different eras of the Western; Wayne was the old guard, an indomitable screen legend of Hollywood’s Golden Age and star of dozens of straightforward good guys vs bad guys horse operas, a totem of a certain vision of American manliness and ideals.Eastwood, on the other hand, was a generation younger and made his name playing far more ambiguous figures in Sergio Leone’s “Dollars Trilogy,” laconic antiheroes who were only the protagonist because everyone around them was even more unscrupulous or just plain villainous. “High Plains Drifter,” Eastwood’s second directorial feature, took his “Man With No Name” persona into even darker territory, an early sign that Eastwood was interrogating the tropes of the genre and his own screen image.Eastwood went on to make his defining statement on the western with his revisionist “Unforgiven,” which, ironically, owes far more to The Duke than you might first expect.So what happens in Unforgiven again?“Unforgiven” opens in the roughneck frontier town of Big Whiskey, lorded over by its stern sheriff Little Bill (Gene Hackman). When two no-good cowboys slash the face of a sex worker, Bill lets them off with a fine, enraging the other women in the brothel. Seeking their own justice, they club together to put forth a $1000 bounty on the cowboys’ heads.We then meet William Munny (Clint Eastwood), an aging former gunslinger and widower now scratching out a meager living on his pig farm with his two children. Munny once was a very bad man but hung up his pistols at the behest of his wife before she passed away, and initially shows no interest when he is approached by The Schofield Kid (Jaimz Woolvett), a big-talking young bounty hunter who wants to partner up to claim the prize. Munny is repentant and haunted by some of the terrible things he did in the past, but he sees the bounty as a way of ensuring a better future for his kids. Needing backup, Munny recruits the help of Ned (Morgan Freeman), a former outlaw friend from the bad old days.Arriving in Big Whiskey, Munny falls foul of Little Bill, who runs the town on a strict no-guns policy and wants to dissuade anyone seeking to claim the women’s bounty. Bill severely beats him, leaving it to Ned and The Kid to nurse him back to health before tracking down the cowboys. Ned realizes he is unable to kill again and leaves for home, but is captured by Bill and his men and tortured to death. Now the sheriff of Big Whiskey is about to see the old Will Munny, who strides into town seeking vengeance for his friend.The origins of Unforgiven“Unforgiven” started life as a screenplay entitled “The William Munny Killings,” written by David Peoples in 1976. That was the same year that John Wayne made his final screen appearance in “The Shootist.”Wayne plays J.B. Books, an aging gunfighter with terminal cancer who has thirty kills to his name, although he maintains he never shot anyone who didn’t have it coming to them. Given just a few weeks to live, he becomes an unlikely father figure to Gillom Rogers (Ron Howard), the young son of widow Bond Rogers (Lauren Bacall) who runs the guest house where Books decides to live out his last days.Rather than withering away in pain, Books arranges to meet three men who have a beef with him for a final shootout, taking the challengers down before he is shot in the back by a cowardly bartender. Gillom arrives on the scene and shoots the bartender with Books’ pistol before throwing the weapon away. Before he dies, Books smiles in approval.It was a fine final performance from Wayne, who himself was diagnosed with cancer in 1964 before having one lung removed. He changed the script so he would get shot in the back, because “no man could ever take John Wayne in a fair fight” (via TV Tropes). Wayne had died onscreen several times before, but no one had bettered him in a shootout in over 80 westerns unless it was by cowardly means.“The Shootist” was a fitting end to Wayne’s career and the end of an era, as the straightforward narratives of classic westerns were giving way to darker revisionist takes like “High Plains Drifter” and “McCabe & Mrs. Miller.” Books’ final gesture to Gillom, rejecting the violent ways of the Old West, was at least a passing nod to modernity.One key scene in Unforgiven was influenced by The ShootistClint Eastwood bought the rights to “The William Munny Killings” in the early ’80s but it wouldn’t become “Unforgiven” until a decade later when he would use the screenplay to bring his formidable western screen presence low. When we first see Munny he’s scrambling around in the mud trying to catch a pig, and when he reluctantly decides to chase the bounty he has trouble even mounting his horse.There are clear parallels between Munny and Books although Eastwood’s character is far more regretful and haunted by the past; Wayne perhaps never needed to repent for his screen violence because he almost always played upstanding, righteous characters. Both men are aware that the end is drawing near, although that knowledge is far more acute for Books with only a few weeks to live. The one scene in “Unforgiven” that links them the most arrives after Munny’s beating at the hands of Little Bill when he admits he is scared of death; it correlates closely with the moment in “The Shootist” when Books says, “I’m just a dying man, scared of the dark.” Screenwriter David Peoples saw the scene as the film’s key moment (via Yahoo):“When I started writing the film, the crux of it for me was the scene where Munny is lying there thinking that he’s dying. I just thought that no one had ever seen a tough guy like this be scared of dying unless it’s some kind of last-minute thing. So that scene was important for me to write, and was very much influenced by The Shootist.”Eastwood and Wayne may not have worked together, but given both actors’ stature in the western genre, it feels fitting that their careers were intertwined in this small but significant way.

Entertainment

The perfect reply comes from 76-year-old Susan Sarandon, who has faced criticism for her appearance

One of the most recognizable actors of all time is Susan Sarandon. The actress is admired for her unflinching self-assurance and capacity to hold her own on screen.

She decided to educate them after they began to criticize her choices.

Hollywood veteran Susan Sarandon is still going strong after a successful career. She rose to fame as an actress thanks to her portrayal of Janet Weiss in the venerable musical The Rocky Horror Picture Show in 1975.

Thelma and Louise was one of the movies she later starred in, for which she won praise from critics. For her performance in the movie, she was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Actress. For her performance in Dead Man Walking, the actress ultimately received an Academy Award.

The actress has always valued her body and taken great pleasure in expressing herself through her sense of style. She has a rather direct demeanor and is forthright about the causes she supports.

The actress’ decision to show up to a red carpet event wearing a white jacket and a black bra was criticized by some. A reporter criticized her outfit as being “totally inappropriate.”. ”.

But the actress chose to use an image rather than try to defend herself verbally. She shared an old photo in which she was only wearing underwear and flaunted her figure. Because a picture speaks a thousand words, Sarandon successfully silenced those who questioned what was “appropriate” for her and what wasn’t.

The actress puts her priorities first rather than worrying about getting older. She remarked in a chat, “When your sense of time has an ending and isn’t finite, like how it feels when you’re young. ” According to the speaker, “When you understand that time is precious—you tend not to waste energy on the small stuff and only to surround yourself with people who are vital, curious, brave, and adventurous. ”.

Sarandon responded, “If you want to age gracefully, probably laugh a lot, get the recommended amount of exercise, eat well, and stay out of the sun would be the main things,” when asked how she manages to stay so young-looking. But according to the actress, maintaining your appearance also calls for a talented makeup and hair team.

Without a doubt, Susan Sarandon is exceptional! The actress stays on her course and ignores those with negative things to say about her. Please let us know in the comments what you thought of her response to the critics.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

MILEY CYRUS STUNNED IN A VERY CHIC GUCCI DRESS WITH A DARING LEG SLIT THAT WENT ALL THE WAY TO HER WAIST DURING HER GRAMMY ACCEPTANCE SPEECH AND APPARENTLY SHE ‘WASN’T WEARING ANY UɴᴅᴇƦᴡᴇᴀƦ’

Miley Cyrus had the crowd roaring when she closed out her Grammys acceptance speech with a cheeky remark about ‘forgetting’ her underwear.
She did so while rocking a very racy Gucci dress with a daring leg slit that climbed to her waist.But now the singer, 31 — who is now a two-time Grammy winner — is insisting that it was only a joke.Miley took to X (formerly Twitter) on Monday to write: ‘PS I was only kidding…. I had on matching custom @gucci panties [HEART-EMOJI]’She then thanked Gucci’s creative director Sabato De Sarno for the ‘head to toe chocolate custom couture’ that’s earned her a ton of attention online.In the same X post, Miley fawned over Mariah Carey, Meryl Streep and Mark Ronson — the trio of stars who presented her with her first-ever Grammys on Sunday night.

Miley Cyrus had the crowd roaring when she closed out her Grammys acceptance speech with a cheeky remark about ‘forgetting’ her underwear – and now she’s clarifying that it was just a joke.

Miley took to X (formerly Twitter) on Monday to write: ‘PS I was only kidding…. I had on matching custom @gucci panties’

While accepting the Record Of The Year trophy, Miley rocked a very racy Gucci dress with a daring leg slit that climbed to her waistShe included photos from the show that showed Meryl handing Miley her Record Of The Year trophy as well as Miley hugging her team, who joined her on stage.

She wrote that the third photo in her post ‘sums up’ her relationship with her Flowers co-writer Michael Pollack and producers Kid Harpoon and Tyler Johnson ‘perfectly.’The image showed Miley in front of the mic accepting their award while Pollack, Harpoon and Johnson stood idly behind her.‘You 3 wanting me to do all the talking until I start talking….’ she teased.Miley was one of the biggest winners of the night as she earned the coveted Record Of The Year and Best Pop Solo Performance for her hit track Flowers.Along with setting social media ablaze with her underwear joke, Miley also got fans talking about her father Billy Ray Cyrus, who she left out of her Record Of The Year acceptance speech.”This award is amazing,’ she began. ‘But I really hope that it doesn’t change anything because my life was beautiful yesterday. Not everyone in the world will get a Grammy, but everyone in this world is spectacular…

‘So please don’t think that this is important, even though it’s very important, right guys? ‘[I want to thank] everyone that’s standing on this stage right now Tom, Tyler, Michael and Greg.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Woman Who Claimed To ‘Marry Her Stepdad’ Clears The Air On Their Relationship

Here’s a 450-word unique post based on the link you provided:

Woman Who Claimed to Marry Her Stepfather Clears the Air on Their Relationship

The internet thrives on shocking stories, but one recent claim left social media users in disbelief. A woman allegedly married her stepfather, sparking outrage, curiosity, and a flood of reactions online. Now, she’s speaking out to set the record straight and clarify the truth behind her controversial statement.

The story first gained traction when a video went viral, showing the woman with her stepfather, leading to accusations of an inappropriate relationship. The online frenzy was fueled by speculation, memes, and heated debates about family boundaries. For weeks, critics and supporters alike dissected the story, with some condemning the alleged union and others calling it a matter of personal freedom.

In a recent interview, the woman addressed the situation head-on, debunking the rumors that she married her stepdad. She explained that her initial claim was misunderstood, blown out of proportion, and taken out of context. According to her, the relationship has been misrepresented, and while they do share a close bond, it is far from what people assumed.

“It’s crazy how quickly the internet twists things. People love drama, but this isn’t what they think it is,” she said. She revealed that her stepfather has been a supportive figure in her life, and their connection is built on mutual respect and care—not romance.

Despite her clarification, the backlash hasn’t entirely subsided. Critics question why she made the claim in the first place, while some accuse her of seeking attention. Others, however, have come to her defense, emphasizing the importance of verifying facts before jumping to conclusions.

Psychologists have weighed in on the situation, highlighting how social media amplifies controversies without context. “In today’s digital age, a misunderstood statement can snowball into a viral sensation within hours,” said one expert.

The woman admits that she didn’t anticipate the uproar her comments would create but hopes that her explanation will put the matter to rest. “I want people to stop judging without knowing the full story,” she added.

The saga serves as a reminder of how quickly stories can spiral out of control online. It also raises questions about privacy and the consequences of sharing personal details in the public eye.

As the dust begins to settle, one thing is clear: the internet never forgets. Whether this will be a lesson learned or just another fleeting viral moment remains to be seen.

What’s your take on this bizarre story? Was it just a misunderstanding, or is there more to it? Share your thoughts below!

 

Continue Reading

Trending