Connect with us

Clint Eastwood

Sofia Coppola’s Remake Improved on This Clint Eastwood Western

THE BIG PICTURE

 Sofia Coppola changes the perspective of The Beguiled to explore the complexities of 19th-century gender dynamics.
 Coppola gives more depth and motivation to the female characters, unlike the original film where they are portrayed as lustful women.
 The complexity of Colin Farrell’s character makes the central incident more interesting, and Coppola adds a touch of humor to the film.

The Western has been one of the most popular American film genres since the silent era of cinema. Even if 1939’s Stagecoach is credited with creating the modern version of the genre, Westerns existed before John Ford’s classic, and they have evolved significantly in the eight decades that followed. Many of these stories have become timeless, and remaking a beloved Western can sometimes create surprising results; for example, James Mangold’s 2007 remake of 3:10 to Yuma added more character depth to the 1957 original. While some Westerns don’t necessitate a remake, Don Siegel’s 1971 Clint Eastwood Western The Beguiled was one that was absolutely necessary. By changing the perspective of the story altogether in her 2017 remake, Sofia Coppola fixed the flaws in the original source material and turned a relatively disposable thriller into a modern classic about the complexities of 19th-century gender dynamics.

The Beguiled 2017 Film Poster

The Beguiled
The unexpected arrival of a wounded Union soldier at a girls school in Virginia during the American Civil War leads to jealousy and betrayal.

Release Date June 30, 2017
Director Sofia Coppola
Cast Colin Farrell , Nicole Kidman , Kirsten Dunst , Elle Fanning , Oona Laurence , Angourie Rice
Rating R
Runtime 93 minutes
Genres Drama , History , Thriller

What Does Sofia Coppola Add to ‘The Beguiled’s Characters?
Both Siegel and Coppolas’ versions of The Beguiled are based on the 1966 novel of the same name by Thomas P. Cullinan. The original film follows the wounded Union soldier John McBurney (Clint Eastwood), who escapes from the perils of battle to find shelter at the Miss Martha Farnsworth Seminary for Young Ladies in the middle of Mississippi. It’s far away from the conflict itself, and the all-female residents of the school are forced to choose what to do with this enigmatic stranger. While some of the residents like 12-year-old Amy (Pamelyn Ferdin) and the schoolteacher Edwina Dabney (Elizabeth Hartman) believe that it is their duty to help an innocent life, no matter which flag he fought for, the strict headmistress Martha Farnsworth (Geraldine Page) insists that a man will only end up causing problems within their secluded learning environment.

While Don Siegel may have been attempting to reflect the restrictive gender dynamics of the era, the depiction of Farnsworth as a hardline man-hater obsessed with castration (and McBurney as a completely innocent bystander) comes off as incredibly problematic. Although Siegel is certainly one of the great filmmakers of his time (responsible for classics like Invasion of the Body Snatchers and Dirty Harry), he’s treating a very complex novel as the inspiration for a thriller where an innocent man is preyed upon by a group of lustful women. Comparatively, Sofia Coppola uses the story to mine a different type of tension. Instead of making a thriller, Coppola turns the concept of one man in the company of five women into a fun, occasionally campy melodrama.

Clint-Eastwood’s-Sobering-Commentary-on-War-in-The-Outlaw-Josey-Wales

Sofia Coppola’s version tells the same exact story, but the perspective is changed by giving more insight into how Miss Farnsworth’s (Nicole Kidman) school operated prior to the arrival of McBurney (Colin Farrell). It’s revealed that since the beginning of the war, many of the teachers and students have abandoned the school out of fear of invasion, as they’ve heard of the Union Army’s “total war” strategy. This presents the plight of Farnsworth in a much more sympathetic light, and it also gives more justification for both Amy’s (Oona Laurence) and Edwinas’ (Kirsten Dunst) motivations.
Amy is left without many other girls to interact with, and thus has become more naive about the kindness of strangers; Edwina is left feeling purposeless with fewer students to watch over and seeks the fulfillment of having another adult around. If the arrival of Eastwood’s McBurney was met with nothing but contempt by the school’s residents, the emergence of Farrell’s McBurney at least presents an open debate among the girls. Coppola doesn’t paint them all in the same light, as she’s known for the complexity that she can bring to her female characters. Miss Farnsworth, Edwina, Amy, and the other students Alicia (Elle Fanning) and Jane (Angourie Rice) have different expectations of McBurney’s motivations based on their own (in some cases limited) interaction with men. It’s not just a timely update; seeing the conflicts and discussions between five generations of women is far more interesting than watching a grizzled Eastwood get spooked out every few moments by a creepy woman.
What Does Sofia Coppola’s ‘The Beguiled’ Change Compared to the Clint Eastwood Original?
While Sofia Coppola’s The Beguiled is decidedly told from the female perspective, it doesn’t mean that McBurney is depicted as a mustache-twirling villain. One of the original film’s flaws is that, despite being wounded and seemingly defenseless, Clint Eastwood looked cooler than ever. Comparatively, Farrell actually showed that this is a grizzled soldier who has been dealing with the perils of combat and is in need of rest. Even some of his objectionable behavior has some motivation behind it; he’s been fighting for his country for months without proper shelter or nutrients, and he’s prone to making rash decisions out of desperation. In fact, the kindness he shows Amy at the beginning when he encounters her on the edge of the schoolyard is completely genuine.

The complexity with which McBurney is depicted makes the central inciting incident more interesting. In the original film, McBurney learns of the women’s intention to harm him after he resists the sexual impulses of Miss Farnsworth herself. It’s an inherently sexist notion; Farnsworth only proclaims that separation is needed because of some buried sexual desire. In Coppola’s version, it’s a combination of McBurney’s affair with Abigail and how he takes advantage of Amy that drives the women to collectively agree that he no longer has a place in their community.
Coppola also understands that at the end of the day, The Beguiled is a melodrama. After realizing they cannot physically overpower McBurney, the women decide to poison him with mushrooms that they serve during an elegant dinner. This is a jump scare in Siegel’s version, but Coppola understands how silly it really is. There is a sickly tension that comes from the pivotal final meal in the film, and it’s almost comical to watch a rugged Farrell thank his hosts for a meal that he doesn’t realize will be his last.

As with any Sofia Coppola movie, The Beguiled is decked out with gorgeous production design, picturesque framing, and elegant costumes. It’s not necessarily a perfect adaptation; neither film truly reckons with the reality that as Southerners during the Civil War, Farnsworth and her companions would have been slave owners. Perhaps an even better remake will emerge at some point that balances the point of view, but as it stands, Coppola’s version represents a step in the right direction.
Sofia Coppola’s The Beguiled is available to stream on Netflix in the U.S.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Clint Eastwood

One Clint Eastwood Film Made Martin Scorsese Turn Down Eddie Murphy’s ‘Beverly Hills Cop’

Clint Eastwood has been an iconic actor ever since he stepped foot in Hollywood. With several action movies to his name, veteran director Martin Scorsese once refused to direct a film which he thought was too similar to one of Eastwood’s offerings.
Talking about the classic 1984 movie Beverly Hills Cop, the movie saw a plethora of directors and actors rejecting the movie. One of these rejections was from Martin Scorsese who felt that the plot was too similar to one of Clint Eastwood’s iconic movies.
Eddie Murphy in Beverly Hills Cop

Eddie Murphy as Axel Foley in Beverly Hills Cop
When Martin Scorsese Rejected A Movie Because of Clint Eastwood!
Back in 1984, director Martin Brest released the buddy cop action-comedy movie Beverly Hills Cop. With a plot of Axel Foley helping a murder investigation and things going south (in a hilarious way), the movie received quite great reviews.
Clint Eastwood in Coogan's Bluff (1968)Clint Eastwood in Coogan’s Bluff (1968)
Also read: Steven Spielberg’s Favorite War Film Starring Clint Eastwood Got Made Due To Elizabeth Taylor’s Children
During the production and writing of the movie, Martin Scorsese was considered as a director of the film. As per the book, Martin Scorsese: A Biography, the director read the plot of the movie and rejected the offer. The director revealed that he felt the concept of Beverly Hills Cop was too similar to Clint Eastwood’s 1968 film Coogan’s Bluff. After Scorsese, David Cronenberg also turned down the movie.
Instead of Eddie Murphy, several actors such as Al Pacino, Sylvester Stallone, and James Caan were also considered for the role. It was Murphy who brought in the humor and a comedic element in the movie which made the movie unique. As for Clint Eastwood, the veteran actor had to go through some disgusting acts just for starring in a role.
Clint Eastwood Had To Smoke Cigars For His Role!
Clint EastwoodClint Eastwood as the Man with No Name in the Dollars trilogy
Portraying the iconic role of Man with No Name, Clint Eastwood worked alongside Italian director Sergio Leone on The Dollars Trilogy. Becoming famous with his on-screen role, Eastwood had to grab some cigars for a shot but Eastwood revealed to The Independent (via Far Out) that he felt like throwing up.
“I went out and bought a bunch of cigars that I thought would look good in a western. I had no idea they’d taste so vile. But I brought those along with me and I gave them to props and we cut them all up.”
Eastwood further continued that when Sergio Leone wasn’t satisfied with a single take, he said to the director,
“You better get it this time, because I’m going to throw up”.
Despite his character being known for smoking cigars, Clint Eastwood never smoked in real life and hated it. As for the film that was too similar to Eastwood’s Coogan’s Bluff, Beverly Hills Cop received a rating of 7.4/10 on IMDB and 83% on Rotten Tomatoes. The film is available to stream on Netflix in the U.S.

Continue Reading

Clint Eastwood

Clint Eastwood disagrees with John Wayne on an important movie theory

We have a bit of a rule that whenever a Hollywood legend like Clint Eastwood or John Wayne has dished out advice on cinema, we listen to it. So what happens when the two great icons of the Western genre disagree on filmmaking? Well, that gives us a bit of a conundrum.
In this case, Clint Eastwood and John Wayne don’t see eye to eye when it comes to… eyes. They’ve both made some of the best Westerns in the history of cinema, but Wayne fundamentally believes you always need to be able to see an actor’s eyes for a scene to work. Eastwood, who is still churning out impressive new movies into his 90s, is not so sure.
“In a lot of those old movies, there’s light all over the place and there’s no contrast. But you really don’t have to see everything,” Eastwood told the DGA Quarterly Magazine. “John Wayne had this theory that you had to see the eyes all the time, the eyes tell the story. I never believed that.”
Eastwood referenced Jack Green and Tom Stern’s lighting for his 1992 Oscar-winner Unforgiven as a great example of an exception to Wayne’s rule. We adore Unforgiven, which is one of the best movies in the history of big-screen Westerns, and so we find it hard to disagree with the man behind making the masterpiece.
Clint Eastwood disagrees with John Wayne about lighting, like he used in Unforgiven


He continued: “You see the eyes when you need to see the eyes. And sometimes, what you don’t see is very appealing to the audience. You can dramatize a picture with shades of light.”
Eastwood singled out Westerns of the past for being particularly guilty of over-lighting scenes. He said: “I like getting on a realistic plane with the light. If you go back and look at some Westerns that were made by some of the most beloved directors of the 1930s and ’40s, you see people walk from the outdoors into a brightly lit room and you wonder: ‘Where’d they get all that electricity back in 1850?’”
The best Clint Eastwood movies, especially those of the last few decades, have certainly taken a more realistic approach to Western stories than the classics of the past. In Unforgiven, especially, it pays off.
We can’t wait to see what Eastwood brings us with Juror #2, which will be his next film. If the man himself is to be believed, it’s also very likely to be his last movie. He’ll definitely want to go out with a bang, and we have the utmost faith in him.
For more on one of Hollywood’s best actors ever, find out why Clint Eastwood is Morgan Freeman’s favorite director and learn why Clint Eastwood regrets this Western. Finally, read our piece exploring how the Western has always been a genre for women too.

Continue Reading

Clint Eastwood

1 Factor in Sergio Leone Films Was Almost as Equally Important to the Plot as Clint Eastwood

Clint Eastwood is one of Hollywood’s most skilled directors, but that doesn’t mean he hasn’t acted in several iconic films as well. This included his legendary role as Blondie in The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. That said, there is one factor in Sergio Leone’s films that was almost as important to the story as Eastwood.
Clint Eastwood has also been part of other iconic films such as Dirty Harry,  A Fistful of Dollars, and many more iconic projects. That said, there is no doubt just how dedicated he has been to all of his films so far in his career.

Help

Clint Eastwood

The One Factor That Was Crucial To Sergio Leone Movies Almost As Much As Clint Eastwood
Sergio Leone’s distinctive style allowed for more time and space for music in his films, enabling a deeper collaboration with composers like Ennio Morricone. Naturally, one can’t imagine Leone without Clint Eastwood either.

BrosSergio Leone and Clint Eastwood

While speaking in an interview with Jon Burlingame & Gary Crowdus, Ennio Morricone emphasized the importance of the director’s choice in allocating time for music. He stated that even ten seconds of audible music when well-placed, can be a more effective collaboration than ten minutes drowned out by dialogue or action.
“Sergio Leone allowed a lot more time and space for music; that was his stylistic choice. And since there was more music, people heard more music. And if they heard more music, they noticed it more. And if they noticed it more, they were able to assimilate it more. This is a sign that is very important to a composer, because now he finds himself collaborating on a more intense level and his music becomes an integral part of the film itself. I will make a very simple, paradoxical statement. If a director gives a composer ten seconds of time, he cannot be heard and therefore cannot collaborate with the director.
However, if a director gives ten minutes of time, the composer can express himself properly. If the ten minutes that you have been given can be heard, and it is not drowned out by either the dialog between the characters or the special effects and action – which distract the public from the music – then the music will be appreciated. However, if in those ten minutes you cannot even begin to hear any musical expression, because of the dialog or action taking place at the same time, the music is completely destroyed. Therefore, ten seconds of music, if it can be heard, is a far better collaboration between director and composer than ten minutes of music which has been stifled by other factors within the film. The final decision of whether to hear the music or not remains in the hands of the director. If the director believes that the music serves a function as a dramatic and expressive form, then the music will be heard; if not, then it will not be heard. This is not a fault; we must always keep in mind Sergio Leone as the central character in this question.”
He made it clear that the director’s decision on whether the music serves a dramatic purpose ultimately determines its impact, with Morricone highlighting Sergio Leone as a pivotal figure in this dynamic relationship.
Clint Eastwood Didn’t Want To Do The Good, The Bad and The Ugly At First
By the mid-1960s, Clint Eastwood had already established himself in the Western genre as a bonafide star and was looking for new challenges in his career. When originally asked to appear in the film, he declined for several reasons.

bangClint Eastwood

One factor was Eastwood’s disappointment in sharing the screen with two established actors, Eli Wallach and Lee Van Cleef. He wasn’t really happy about Wallach’s character being given the best dialogues. In addition to that, Eastwood was offered lesser pay, as his status as a major star in the United States wasn’t really established then.
Thankfully, the producers were eager to have Eastwood on board for the film. Therefore, they offered him a $250,000 salary, 10% of the profits and a new Ferrari 275 GTB. In the end, Eastwood accepted and the rest is history.

Continue Reading

Trending